A Meat Stuffer Homemade

the city government affidavits

Macri was enriched 42% in one year, and his ministers have increased their assets 32%
The first year of operation was very favorable for the economy of staff members in Buenos Aires. According to the statements that were viewed PROFILE Ten of the thirteen principal officers had increases. The Education Minister, Mariano Narodowski, was the largest asset growth exhibited in proportional terms, an increase of 189 percent. Mauricio Macri, meanwhile, was the biggest money accumulated in a year: nearly $ 12 million.
By Sebastian Iñurrieta / Rodrigo Alegre

public function. Macri said property for $ 39 million. Narodowski and Cabrera have less, but grew much faster.
The duties and difficulties caused by any first year in office did not prevent the principal officers care locals maintain their own pockets. From the day he assumed in December 2007 until the last day of 2008, the cabinet Buenos Aires heritage increased on average by 32%.
Only 3 of the 13 PRO leaders who hold the highest public office in the City had no profits from one year to another: two of them lost part of the capital and a minister had stated that maintains the same property in 2007.
More beyond ideology and project management, equipment macrista have one thing in common: their economic carefree. Eight of them are millionaires. Who is ahead in the race heritage is the prime minister, Mauricio Macri, with more than 39 million pesos.

For comparison, PROFILE took the value of the assets declared in each case (property, vehicles, stock, money owed) and contrasted with its liabilities such as debts or credits taken. It was not taken into account in the affidavit, 2009 by Hernán Lombardi, head of the cultural portfolio, for lack of data. The maximum asset growth was proportional held by the Education Minister Mariano Narodowski, with a rise of 189%. The official who this week was punctuated by the eavesdropping scandal in 2007 went from having only two thousand dollars in cash to $ 238,910 a year later. Although he gave a house, the property tax value was less than the $ 50 mil.

His pair of Economic Development, Francisco Cabrera, the secondary with a 113% increase in their heritage. A reassessment increased $ 600 thousand fiscal value of the four houses. But what triggered the increase was almost double the $ 109 000 which was deposited in banks and cash totaled $ 1,248,000. Just
third in the ranking of increase appears Macri. Although the $ 209 thousand of gains Narodowski sound almost insignificant compared to the nearly $ 12 million increase in assets of the prime minister. PROFILE

attempted to communicate with and Narodowski Macri, the most wealth and the largest proportional growth, but none agreed to give explanations on their affidavits. The list of officials, in decreasing order, continue with the security ministers, Guillermo Montenegro (39%), Finance, Nestor Grindetti (18.8%), and Public Works, Daniel Chain (16%).

In case of the Social Development Minister Mary Eugenia Vidal, who denied that there are changes from one year the other, adds another suffered almost no variation: Juan Pablo Piccardo, head of Public Space and Environment, which only increased its assets by 0.14%.
The chief of staff, Horacio Rodríguez Larreta, not turned out well the last business year. Its assets fell by 4.5%, although the two properties that have in paradise Neuquén Villa La Angostura, to update their assessed value dating back to 1996, went from $ 1,600 to $ 100 thousand each. But decreased their bank desposit.
The international economic crisis does appear that it fell to Secretary of Social Communication, Gregory Centurion, whose assets fell 41%. Follow



lax regulation "No change," he wrote in his own handwriting Social Development Minister, María Eugenia Vidal in the comments section to make. The official did not even bother to put his name on the front page. Just those two words, and signed it.
Regulations 1381 Decree 2004, which requires officials to submit their affidavits porteños public is not very strict. Should record only the city where they are located their property and their tax contributions. No need to clarify in which area they are. They need not testify, although some do, the banks they trust their savings. Its investments in companies and corporations are not fully regulated.